Another successful Pania meeting on Thursday 18th August.
Patrick was the Toastmaster, for the first time and he
handled the role extremely well. As the TM’s table was pushed back (to allow
room for Noel’s video), he made a point of moving away from the table, each time
he spoke, to where he could be easily seen by the audience. He also produced a
well designed meeting programme.
In Graeme’s introduction and evaluation of Emma, he read and
re-read the objectives, which included the use of triads. For those, like me,
who did not know what a triad is in this context, the following is the Wikipedia
explanation:
The rule of three or power of three is a
writing principle that suggests that things that come in threes are funnier,
more satisfying, or more effective than other numbers of things. The reader or
audience of this form of text is also thereby more likely to remember the
information. This is because having three entities combines both brevity and
rhythm with having the smallest amount of information to create a pattern. It
makes the author or speaker appear knowledgeable while being both simple and
catchy.
Emma gave an excellent presentation entitled The Successful
Nerd. She told us about being a contestant on a British TV game show, complete
with role play, (ably assisted by Darryl) and consequently winning a trip to
Hong Kong.
Graeme gave a very good evaluation of Emma’s speech with
three suggestions: Slow down, use pause and don’t stand too close to the
audience.
Noel made use of a projector to give a very interesting Power
Point presentation to explain the difficulties of communicating with workplaces
in different countries.
Noel used data from Professor Geert Hofstede who has studied
the cultural and behavioural differences of many countries, in this case New
Zealand and Malaysia and used graphs to show the differences.
Noel was very well evaluated by Wendy, with the
recommendation to use a pointer. Although, Wendy spoke directly to Noel, rather
than speaking in the third person.
Table Topics was conducted by Marc with the topics being very
current affairs.
The speakers and subjects were:
Linda - H N water quality. Should heads roll?
Anna - Should we care about Auckland’s housing crisis?
Laurel – US election. Should we care?
Jane – Olympics. Are our expectations too high?
All the speakers spoke well and to the subject.
Table Topics was evaluated by Darryl, who gave good feedback
to each speaker.
Russell kept the lights and Mike gave a full and proficient General Evaluation to wind up the meeting.
Best speaker – Emma.
Best Evaluator – Graeme.
Best Table Topics – Linda.
NEXT WEEK WE HAVE THE TABLE TOPICS CONTEST- Be in- to win!!
No comments:
Post a Comment